Hierarchy of Controls in Risk Assessment
Every workplace comes with its share of hazards. From slippery floors and loud machinery to toxic chemicals and electrical equipment, employees face potential risks every day. The role of risk assessment is to identify these hazards, evaluate the associated risks, and determine the best ways to control them.
But here’s the catch: not all control measures are equal. Handing out gloves and helmets may feel like you’re doing enough, but what if the hazard itself could be eliminated? Enter the Hierarchy of Controls — a systematic, proven approach used worldwide to minimize risks and protect workers.
This framework doesn’t just list control measures; it ranks them by effectiveness. At the top of the hierarchy are measures that remove hazards altogether, while at the bottom are personal protective equipment (PPE), considered the least reliable option. Understanding this hierarchy is critical for safety professionals, employers, and workers alike because it provides a roadmap to safer workplaces.
In this detailed article, we’ll dive deep into the hierarchy of controls, breaking down each level, exploring real-life examples, common mistakes, and industry applications. By the end, you’ll not only understand the theory but also know how to apply it effectively in real work environments.
Understanding the Hierarchy of Controls
The Hierarchy of Controls is a structured system that prioritizes risk control strategies. Developed and promoted by occupational safety organizations like OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) and codified in standards such as ISO 45001, the hierarchy ensures hazards are addressed at their root rather than relying solely on reactive or protective measures.
It’s often depicted as a pyramid or an inverted triangle, with the most effective methods at the top and the least effective at the bottom:
- Elimination
- Substitution
- Engineering Controls
- Administrative Controls
- Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Why does this order matter? Because the higher up the pyramid, the more the hazard is controlled at the source, reducing reliance on human behavior. As you move down, controls become more dependent on worker compliance and are therefore less reliable.
The Five Levels of the Hierarchy of Controls
Let’s explore each level in detail, with practical applications and real-world examples.
Level 1: Elimination
Elimination is the gold standard of risk control. It means completely removing the hazard so there is no possibility of harm. If the hazard doesn’t exist, workers cannot be exposed to it.
Examples of Elimination:
- Removing asbestos insulation from buildings during renovation.
- Automating manual lifting tasks to remove the risk of musculoskeletal injuries.
- Designing buildings with natural lighting to eliminate the need for hazardous high-wattage bulbs.
Advantages:
- Risk reduced to zero for that hazard.
- Permanent solution — no ongoing costs for PPE or training.
Limitations:
- Often expensive or technically challenging.
- Not always feasible (e.g., electricity can’t be eliminated in electrical work).
Case Example:
A construction company redesigned its scaffolding system to eliminate the need for workers to climb at unsafe heights. By redesigning the process, fall hazards were completely removed rather than mitigated.
Level 2: Substitution
If elimination isn’t possible, the next best approach is substitution — replacing a hazardous substance, material, or process with something safer.
Examples of Substitution:
- Using water-based paints instead of solvent-based paints.
- Replacing silica-containing materials with non-silica alternatives in construction.
- Using battery-powered tools instead of gas-powered tools to avoid harmful fumes.
Advantages:
- Can significantly reduce risks without eliminating the task.
- Often improves worker comfort and efficiency.
Limitations:
- The substitute may introduce new hazards. For example, a water-based paint might still contain irritants.
- Requires thorough risk assessment before implementation.
Case Example:
A manufacturing facility replaced a highly flammable cleaning solvent with a biodegradable, non-flammable alternative. This substitution reduced both fire hazards and toxic exposure risks.
Level 3: Engineering Controls
When elimination or substitution isn’t feasible, the next step is engineering controls. These involve designing physical changes to isolate workers from hazards.
Examples of Engineering Controls:
- Installing machine guards to protect against moving parts.
- Using ventilation systems to capture welding fumes or chemical vapors.
- Designing soundproof enclosures for noisy machinery.
- Implementing automated robotic systems to handle hazardous materials.
Advantages:
- Effective long-term solutions that reduce human error.
- Can be integrated into workplace design.
Limitations:
- Higher upfront costs for equipment or redesign.
- Requires ongoing maintenance to remain effective.
Case Example:
In a laboratory, fume hoods were installed to ensure hazardous chemical vapors were contained and extracted before reaching workers. This engineering control significantly reduced exposure levels.
Level 4: Administrative Controls
Administrative controls focus on changing the way people work. These do not eliminate hazards but reduce the likelihood of exposure through rules, training, and procedures.
Examples of Administrative Controls:
- Implementing rotating shifts to limit exposure to loud environments.
- Developing safe work procedures for confined space entry.
- Conducting regular safety training for employees.
- Placing warning signs and color-coded labels near hazards.
Advantages:
- Relatively inexpensive to implement.
- Useful for risks that can’t be engineered out.
Limitations:
- Rely heavily on worker compliance and behavior.
- Human error and fatigue can undermine effectiveness.
Case Example:
In an oil refinery, administrative controls were introduced requiring workers to undergo permit-to-work training before engaging in hot work activities. This reduced fire and explosion risks.
Level 5: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
PPE is considered the last line of defense. It doesn’t eliminate hazards but provides a barrier between the worker and the hazard.
Examples of PPE:
- Helmets to protect against falling objects.
- Gloves to protect against chemical burns.
- Respirators to protect against inhaling toxic gases.
- Safety goggles to protect against flying particles.
Advantages:
- Essential in high-risk environments.
- Relatively affordable compared to engineering changes.
Limitations:
- PPE can fail if not fitted or maintained properly.
- Relies entirely on worker compliance.
- Can be uncomfortable, reducing productivity.
Case Example:
A construction site required all workers to wear high-visibility vests and hard hats. While these didn’t eliminate hazards, they reduced the risk of injury when elimination or engineering controls were impractical.
Why the Hierarchy is Structured This Way
The pyramid structure reflects effectiveness. Controls at the top — elimination and substitution — directly tackle hazards at their root. As you move down, the measures shift towards reducing the consequences of exposure rather than removing the hazard.
- Top Levels = Hazard-focused (preventing exposure entirely).
- Bottom Levels = Worker-focused (protecting the person rather than removing the hazard).
This is why safety experts insist that PPE should never be the primary solution unless higher-level controls are not feasible.
Comparison Chart of the Hierarchy of Controls
| Control Level | Effectiveness | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Elimination | 100% | Remove asbestos |
| Substitution | Very High | Water-based paints |
| Engineering | High | Machine guards, ventilation |
| Administrative | Moderate | Training, shift rotation |
| PPE | Low | Helmets, respirators |
Common Mistakes in Applying the Hierarchy
- Over-reliance on PPE – Many companies jump straight to issuing PPE instead of exploring elimination or engineering solutions.
- Ignoring feasibility of elimination – Assuming elimination is impossible without proper analysis.
- Neglecting substitution risks – Introducing substitutes without assessing new hazards.
- Failing to maintain controls – Engineering solutions like ventilation must be inspected regularly.
- Not combining controls – Often, the most effective approach is layering controls.
Hierarchy of Controls in Different Industries
Construction:
- Fall protection: guardrails (engineering), harnesses (PPE).
- Dust control: water sprays (engineering), respirators (PPE).
Oil & Gas:
- Gas detection systems (engineering).
- Permit-to-work procedures (administrative).
Healthcare:
- Needleless systems (substitution).
- Hand hygiene protocols (administrative).
- Gloves, masks, PPE (last resort).
Manufacturing:
- Robotic welding (elimination of worker exposure).
- Soundproof booths for machinery (engineering).
Legal and Regulatory Perspectives
- OSHA (U.S.): Mandates that employers prioritize elimination and substitution before PPE.
- ISO 45001: International standard requiring systematic risk management using the hierarchy.
- EU Directives: Encourage substitution of dangerous substances under REACH legislation.
Employers who skip higher-level controls and rely solely on PPE may face regulatory penalties.
Case Study: Applying the Hierarchy
Noise Hazard in a Factory:
- Elimination: Replace noisy machine with a quieter alternative.
- Substitution: Use low-noise tools.
- Engineering: Install soundproof enclosures.
- Administrative: Rotate workers, schedule noisy tasks off-shift.
- PPE: Earplugs or earmuffs.
By applying multiple layers, noise exposure dropped below legal limits, protecting both health and productivity.
Conclusion
The Hierarchy of Controls isn’t just a diagram; it’s a philosophy for smart, effective risk management. By prioritizing elimination, substitution, and engineering solutions, employers create safer workplaces where hazards are tackled at their source. Administrative controls and PPE still play a role, but they should never be the sole defense.
A truly safe workplace is built on layered protection, where the hierarchy guides decision-making and safety becomes part of organizational culture. In the end, safety is not just compliance — it’s about ensuring everyone goes home safe, every day.
Designing a 3×3 vs 5×5 Risk Matrix
Gas Cylinder Handling JSA – Job Safety Analysis
Tower Crane Operation JSA – Job Safety Analysis
Forklift Operation JSA – Job Safety Analysis
Lockout/Tagout LOTO Procedures JSA – Job Safety Analysis
FAQs
1. What is the most effective control measure?
Elimination is the most effective because it completely removes the hazard.
2. Why is PPE considered the last resort?
Because PPE doesn’t remove hazards — it only reduces the consequences if exposure occurs.
3. Can different controls be combined?
Absolutely. In fact, layered controls often provide the best protection.
4. How do you prioritize controls in risk assessment?
Always start from the top of the hierarchy (elimination) and move down until you find a feasible solution.
5. What role does training play in the hierarchy?
Training falls under administrative controls and ensures other measures are used effectively.
